Skip to content

Tech Law Forum @ NALSAR

A student-run group at NALSAR University of Law

Menu
  • Home
  • Blog Series
  • Write for us!
  • About Us
Menu

Write for us!

Submission Guidelines

Last Updated: September 10, 2025

Eligibility

The Tech Law Forum @ NALSAR (TLF) primarily publishes three types of writing pieces:

  1. Articles: The primary format of the TLF Blog, usually 1,200–1,800 words, offering concise, well-argued perspectives on law and technology.
  2. Practitioner Perspectives & Policy Briefs: Practitioner-oriented analyses addressing practical regulatory or policy challenges, including comparative analysis.
  3. Book Reviews: Concise and critical reviews of recent works in technology law and related fields.

Topics of Interest

TLF publishes across the spectrum of law, technology, and society, including (but not limited to):

  • Artificial Intelligence (governance, explainability, liability, audits)
  • Data protection and privacy law
  • Cybersecurity law and policy
  • Platform regulation, content moderation, and intermediary liability
  • Competition and antitrust in digital markets
  • FinTech, payments law, crypto-assets, and DeFi
  • Telecommunications, spectrum, and net neutrality
  • Intellectual property in the digital economy
  • Biotech, healthtech, and data governance
  • Digital identity, e-governance, and public sector technology
  • Digital evidence, forensics, and criminal procedure
  • Technology and human rights (surveillance, free expression, discrimination)
  • Legal tech, access to justice, and automation of legal services
  • Regulatory sandboxes, experimental governance, and tech policy design
  • Contemporary judicial or policy developments in technology law

NOTE: This list is illustrative, not exhaustive. We welcome doctrinal, empirical, comparative, and normative approaches. Submissions of contemporaneous relevance and those proposing practical regulatory solutions are especially encouraged.

Author Eligibility

Submissions are welcome from:

  • (i) Students (law and interdisciplinary fields)
  • (ii) Academics and researchers
  • (iii) Practitioners and policy-makers
  • (iv) Anyone interested in Technology Law

NOTE: Early-career authors and first-time contributors are especially encouraged.

Use of AI Policy

Authors may use generative AI tools at any stage in the writing process, so long as all such usage is disclosed. Authors must document any use of AI tools in the title page footnote, e.g., “ChatGPT was used for copy-editing.” Please disclose both the tool(s) used (e.g., ChatGPT) as well as all functions for which those tools were used (e.g., copy-editing, drafting, figure generation, citation formatting, research, idea generation, etc.). Failure to disclose the use of such tools may be considered against a submission.

All authors are ultimately responsible for the content of their submissions, and all submissions are subject to our evaluation criteria as described below. Thus, submissions that hyperlink/cite non-existent sources, that are missing citations or sources, that insufficiently engage with the current literature, that are not stylistically effective, that plagiarize from other sources, etc., will be evaluated accordingly.

Prior Publication Policy

Articles submitted to TLF must not have been published in any other blog or archival venue. Prior to submission, authors should not have committed to publishing their submitted articles with any other journal or archival venue.

Submissions must be original, unpublished, and not sent for publication/under review elsewhere.

Articles/Notes previously presented at conference presentations may be eligible, but this must be disclosed in the submission form.

How to Submit

  • Submissions must be sent via this form ONLY.
  • Subject Line:
    • Standard: “Submission for TLF Blog | [Title of Piece]”
    • Expedited (time-sensitive): “Expedited | Submission for TLF Blog | [Title of Piece]” (authors must justify expedited consideration). For time-sensitive pieces (e.g., commentary on breaking judgments or regulations), authors may request expedited review by indicating the same in the form given for submissions accordingly and explaining the urgency.
  • Files required: Anonymised manuscript (.doc/.docx only).

Citation and Formatting Requirements

  • Word Limit: Preferred length 1,200–1,800 words. Submissions up to 2500 words may be accepted if justified.
  • Document Format: Submit in Word (.doc/.docx).
  • Citations: Hyperlink sources where possible. If unavailable online, use footnotes (OSCOLA 4th edition recommended, not mandatory). For statutes, use India Code hyperlinks.
  • Completeness: Submissions must be fully edited and polished. Drafts will not be reviewed.

Review Process

  • Acknowledgement: Authors will receive confirmation of submission.
  • Preliminary Review: Conducted within 7–10 days; outcome may be rejection or provisional acceptance.
  • Revisions: If requested, authors must typically submit revisions within 10–20 days.
  • Final Acceptance & Publication: Accepted pieces will be scheduled promptly, subject to editorial discretion.

Review Criteria

Submissions will be evaluated on:

  • Rigour and precision of legal reasoning
  • Policy relevance or practical implications
  • Originality of argument and perspective
  • Engagement with primary sources and scholarship
  • Clarity, conciseness, and accessibility

We do not accept promotional content, superficial commentary, or mere descriptive restatements.

Upon Acceptance

By submitting, authors agree to cooperate in TLF’s editorial process, which may involve substantive and stylistic edits to ensure clarity, accessibility, and scholarly quality. Copyright vests with TLF upon publication, with full author credit.

Contact Us

All queries must be directed to: techlawforum@nalsar.ac.in.

Submissions sent to other addresses may not be reviewed.

We look forward to receiving your work and to advancing critical debates at the intersection of law and technology.

— Editorial Board, Tech Law Forum @ NALSAR

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Betting on Balance: India’s Online Gaming Dilemma
  • Part II | AI CHATBOT MY PERSONAL THERAPISTS!!!
  • Part I | AI CHATBOT: MY PERSONAL THERAPISTS!!!
  • Promotion in Name, Prohibition in Practice: Reality of India’s Online Gaming Law
  • Part II | SET LAWS, SHROUDED GAPS: Evaluating the DSAR in wake of DPDPA from the perspective of FSPs
  • Part I | SET LAWS, SHROUDED GAPS: Evaluating the DSAR in wake of DPDPA from the perspective of FSPs
  • Return from Hiatus
  • The Fate of Section 230 vis-a-vis Gonzalez v. Google: A Case of Looming Legal Liability
  • Paid News Conundrum – Right to fair dealing infringed?
  • Chronicles of AI: Blurred Lines of Legality and Artists’ Right To Sue in Prospect of AI Copyright Infringement

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 Tech Law Forum @ NALSAR | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme