Skip to content

Tech Law Forum @ NALSAR

A student-run group at NALSAR University of Law

Menu
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
  • Blog Series
  • Editors’ Picks
  • Write for us!
  • About Us
Menu

An Explanation of Bitcoins, Part I (The Philosophy)

Posted on September 27, 2014 by Kartik Chawla

(Image Source: https://flic.kr/p/e9LG7B)

(This post is based in part on a paper published by Rostrum Law Review)

Most of the currencies in the world right now, and all the reserve currencies, are fiat currencies, declared to be currencies by a legal tender, and unsupported by any physical commodity, only the rules of supply and demand (Incidentally, the term ‘fiat’ is Latin for “let it be done” or “it shall be”). These currencies usually have a central regulatory body which issues them, and are consequently called ‘centralised’.

Satoshi Nakamoto (the name is a pseudonym), the creator of Bitcoins, had a problem with this centralisation of currency, responding to it in the following terms in one of his earlier works “The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that’s required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve. We have to trust them with our privacy, trust them not to let identity thieves drain our accounts. Their massive overhead costs make micropayments impossible.”

Thus, Nakamoto’s political ideologies in creating Bitcoins revolve around creating an open-source, decentralised currency, that was outside the control of any government. In fact, he introduced the currency just a few months after the global collapse of the banking sector, perhaps frustrated by the same.

The decentralisation of Bitcoins rests in the fact that it allows its users to send money over the internet directly to each other without an intermediary, and in the fact that no outside party can create them. This entirely cuts out the role of the central banks and governments in online transactions, creating a currency for which, as Nakamoto said, “everything is based on crypto proof instead of trust”. Furthermore, unlike the banks and governments who can print more or less money according to their requirements, the bots that are currently creating Bitcoins are programmed to stop making them in or around the year 2140. This would mean that unlike fiat currencies, whose value is derived through regulation or law and underwritten by the state, Bitcoins derive their value through the simple principles of supply and demand. They have no intrinsic value and no backing, their value depending entirely on what people are willing to trade for them.

Thus, Nakamoto had created the first working cryptocurrency, making it as different from the existing fiat currencies as possible. It was meant to be the birth of an alternative model of currency, a new method of transaction, entirely free of government control, and, perhaps a challenge to it. It was to challenge the governments, to make people rethink the existing economic systems, to question their faith in it.

Subscribe

Recent Posts

  • Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Ketuban Pecah Dini di RSUD Lamaddukelleng Kabupaten Wajo
  • The Fate of Section 230 vis-a-vis Gonzalez v. Google: A Case of Looming Legal Liability
  • Paid News Conundrum – Right to fair dealing infringed?
  • Chronicles of AI: Blurred Lines of Legality and Artists’ Right To Sue in Prospect of AI Copyright Infringement
  • Dali v. Dall-E: The Emerging Trend of AI-generated Art
  • BBC Documentary Ban: Yet Another Example of the Government’s Abuse of its Emergency Powers
  • A Game Not Played Well: A Critical Analysis of The Draft Amendment to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021
  • The Conundrum over the legal status of search engines in India: Whether they are Significant Social Media Intermediaries under IT Rules, 2021? (Part II)
  • The Conundrum over the legal status of search engines in India: Whether they are Significant Social Media Intermediaries under IT Rules, 2021? (Part I)
  • Lawtomation: ChatGPT and the Legal Industry (Part II)

Categories

  • 101s
  • 3D Printing
  • Aadhar
  • Account Aggregators
  • Antitrust
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Bitcoins
  • Blockchain
  • Blog Series
  • Bots
  • Broadcasting
  • Censorship
  • Collaboration with r – TLP
  • Convergence
  • Copyright
  • Criminal Law
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Data Protection
  • Digital Piracy
  • E-Commerce
  • Editors' Picks
  • Evidence
  • Feminist Perspectives
  • Finance
  • Freedom of Speech
  • GDPR
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intermediary Liability
  • Internet Broadcasting
  • Internet Freedoms
  • Internet Governance
  • Internet Jurisdiction
  • Internet of Things
  • Internet Security
  • Internet Shutdowns
  • Labour
  • Licensing
  • Media Law
  • Medical Research
  • Network Neutrality
  • Newsletter
  • Online Gaming
  • Open Access
  • Open Source
  • Others
  • OTT
  • Personal Data Protection Bill
  • Press Notes
  • Privacy
  • Recent News
  • Regulation
  • Right to be Forgotten
  • Right to Privacy
  • Right to Privacy
  • Social Media
  • Surveillance
  • Taxation
  • Technology
  • TLF Ed Board Test 2018-2019
  • TLF Editorial Board Test 2016
  • TLF Editorial Board Test 2019-2020
  • TLF Editorial Board Test 2020-2021
  • TLF Editorial Board Test 2021-2022
  • TLF Explainers
  • TLF Updates
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtual Reality

Tags

AI Amazon Antitrust Artificial Intelligence Chilling Effect Comparative Competition Copyright copyright act Criminal Law Cryptocurrency data data protection Data Retention e-commerce European Union Facebook facial recognition financial information Freedom of Speech Google India Intellectual Property Intermediaries Intermediary Liability internet Internet Regulation Internet Rights IPR Media Law News Newsletter OTT Privacy RBI Regulation Right to Privacy Social Media Surveillance technology The Future of Tech TRAI Twitter Uber WhatsApp

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
best online casino in india
© 2025 Tech Law Forum @ NALSAR | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme